The "Geo-Green" Alternative

by Jeff McIntire-Strasburg on January 30, 2005

in Uncategorized

Maybe it’s just me, but Thomas Friedman’s idea of a “Geo-Green” approach to the Middle East seems awfully simplistic, as Dave Roberts points out in his response to Geoff Debelko’s post at Gristmill. Ultimately, this kind of argument might appeal (ironically) to Bush’s neo-conservative advisors as a possible alternative to outright military invasion, but I’m not sure they’re that patient. I also agree with Dave that the Middle Eastern oil barons will likely find other customers…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

{ 1 trackback }

Friedman Video Blocked on YouTube - ‘Greenwash Guerillas’ Respond : Red, Green, and Blue
April 29, 2008 at 10:10 am

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Mathieu August 6, 2008 at 8:50 pm

Did you know that wind has potential for power? It does not damage the environment plus its a powerful source of alternative energy. It is gaining popularity because other sources of fuel damage the environment and also fuel prices are now very high. When thinking of wind power you may think about windmills, but wind can also be turned into electricity.

Go Green!

Leave a Comment

Previous post: Interesting Thoughts…

Next post: Backlash and Bedlam…